Some guy on TV stuck on a desert island was declaring himself a pescetarian.
That doesn’t mean he was annoying – even though he clearly was.
It meant that he only eats fish.
He was doing a big boy cry as some others wanted to kill a pig.
So I asked him through my TV :
“What’s the difference between a fish and a pig?”
They are the same – in terms of sentience.
Is there a superior morality in not eating one and not eating another?
He did not respond.
Proving I am right once more.
A pescetarian is a portmanteau word, combining the Italian word for fish – pesces – with vegetarian.
Similar to blonkers.
A portmanteau word describing a particular kind of madness for which there is no cure.
Pesky can only be used on old episodes of Scooby Doo.
I had to get special permission from Hanna-Barbera for the last sentence and earlier reference.
Piggies are not for hands, it’s Teddy Bears
The rebel fish 
I think you meant to say they ONLY eat fish. But, I do agree. It makes no sense! They’re all living things. Unless they are doing it for dietary or allergy reasons… It makes no sense.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I preferred the first version! Just because I cod.
LikeLiked by 2 people
In Maine… we have hogfish. Which blurs the line entirely.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Signs at the Maine state line ‘ Are you strange? If yes please enter’
LikeLiked by 1 person
We like it that way. It keeps the faint of heart at the border….
😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think I belong there, but is there a thing as too strange? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not in my book…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The difference, you ask? I suggest you try to make bacon from a fish.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m don’t mind trying but I’ll need the money up front
LikeLiked by 1 person
On a scale of 1 to 10 only fish have them!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Winston Churchill said that first 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
But in the morning she was still ugly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought pescetarians ate fish!
LikeLiked by 1 person
They do. But is eating fish morally Superior to eating a pig?
LikeLiked by 2 people
It depends. Pigs are smart like dogs, but some fish are more endangered. How about cats and dogs? I find that more upsetting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It definitely is. If the guy on the island had a cat no-one would have argued . If the guy had a dog only a North Korean would have argued. It’s sort of like Dolphins – bright can’t eat them but Tuna…
LikeLiked by 2 people
I want to say thank you.
Never quite understood myself why some animals seem to take higher rank than others.
Makes absolutely no sense.
I am thinking someone just lacks the stones to go all the way… but why fish should be the accepted feed….no clue!😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fortunately it only applies to fish and pigs. there are no other strange rules and contradictions in life, thankfully 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
We have more in common with pigs that with fish? Plus fish tend not to look into your soul when you kill them
LikeLiked by 1 person
is there a human element? Convenience? Perhaps things would change quicker if more were killing directly what they eat. But is killing fish because they look gormless even worse?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Personally if I had to kill what I ate I’d be living on salad and veg – I went fishing once and my boyfriend at the time killed the only fish I caught (a cod not that that has any bearing on it) and I was heartbroken. I guess I’m a hypocrite and should really be a vegetarian but I like eating meat and fish so what can I say?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hypocrisy rules 🙂 Only ever caught a fish at a fairground. Fortunately didn’t have to eat it
LikeLiked by 1 person